Skip to content
Question Vault?
Free to readNo accountNo email wallNo invented statisticsNo partial listsCopy or print any set and take it with you

Questions to Ask About the Great Migration

These are for anyone trying to understand the Great Migration, the move of about six million Black Americans out of the South between roughly 1910 and 1970: a class, a book group reading The Warmth of Other Suns, or a grandchild with an elder to ask. They run in the order the move did, from the reasons for leaving through the journey, arrival in the cities, work and housing, and what changed in both regions afterward. The last group is for sitting down with a relative whose family made the trip, or one whose family watched the others go.

61 questions

Want questions from the whole vault instead? Try the random question generator.

The questions

Each question, and why to ask it

Leaving

What was the Great Migration, and who took part in it?

Why ask it

The move of about six million Black Americans out of the South to cities in the North, Midwest and West between roughly 1910 and 1970. The part most summaries skip is that nobody organized it: it was millions of separate family decisions, made without a leader or a plan. If the person you ask starts on the Puritan voyages of the 1630s or the wildebeest herds of East Africa, which share the name, say which migration you mean.

When did the Great Migration start and end, and why do historians split it into two waves?

Why ask it

The first wave is usually dated from 1910 or 1916 to 1940 and the second from 1940 to 1970, with the Depression slowing the flow in between. The second was the larger of the two and reached the West Coast, which the first had barely touched. Both 1916 and 1940 fall just before the United States entered a world war, with Northern plants already short of hands, and a student who knows that can explain the two surges.

Why did so many Black Southerners decide to leave?

Why ask it

Textbooks list these as the push factors: Jim Crow law, the threat of lynching, sharecropping debt that never cleared, country schools that shut for planting and picking, and no vote. Ask which of those one family could have named as its own reason, because people left over a particular insult or a particular danger and not over a list.

What was pulling people toward Northern cities?

Why ask it

The pull factors were factory wages far above anything field work paid, schools that ran a full year, a ballot, and a relative already there with a spare bed. The pull grew stronger when the First World War cut off immigration from Europe and Northern employers started recruiting in the South. Have students sort the pulls into promises that held up and promises that did not.

How many people moved, and how did that change where Black Americans lived?

Why ask it

Roughly six million over six decades, a number that means more as a share: about nine in ten Black Americans lived in the South in 1910, and by 1970 it was closer to half. Put those two fractions on the board before anyone talks about music or politics, since the rest follows from that shift. Census tables for a single city, decade by decade, show it better than any national total.

How did sharecropping keep a family poor and in debt?

Why ask it

A family farmed someone else's land for a share of the crop, bought seed and food on credit at the landowner's store, and heard at settlement time that it had come out behind again. The landowner kept the books, and disputing them was dangerous. A student who can describe settlement day can explain why some families left after dark.

What did the boll weevil and the Mississippi flood of 1927 have to do with it?

Why ask it

The weevil wrecked cotton crops across the South in the 1910s and 1920s, and the flood drove hundreds of thousands of people from their homes along the river, so there was less work to stay for. Both are a useful check on an answer that makes the migration purely about wages or purely about racism. For an essay, weigh the two against Jim Crow in one named state.

How did news of the North reach a farm in Mississippi or Georgia?

Why ask it

Through letters from relatives, visitors home in city clothes, labor agents, and the Chicago Defender, a Black newspaper that Pullman porters carried south and that was read aloud in barbershops and churches. The Defender printed job notices and urged its readers to come. Letters written by migrants in those years have been published, and reading two or three aloud is one of the better ways to open a class.

Who tended to leave first, and who stayed?

Why ask it

Often the young, the single and people with a trade or a little schooling went ahead, then sent for the others once there was a room and a job. That corrects the picture of whole families boarding one train together. Staying was a decision too, made for land, for aging parents, for a church, or out of a refusal to be run off.

How did Southern landowners and officials try to stop people from going?

Why ask it

Some towns charged labor agents ruinous license fees, police pulled travelers off station platforms and held them for vagrancy, and in places the Defender was confiscated. The effort shows how much the Southern economy rested on the people who were leaving. The follow-up is why so few employers tried better pay and fairer treatment first.

Was leaving a form of protest?

Why ask it

Some historians call it a vote cast with the feet by people who were allowed no other. Others note that most migrants explained themselves in practical terms: a job, a school, a night's sleep without fear. It works as a debate because both sides can quote the migrants' own letters.

The journey

How did people travel, and what did the trip cost a family?

Why ask it

Mostly by train, later by bus and car, and a ticket could mean months of saving or the sale of a mule, the tools and the furniture. Many families could raise one fare at a time and went in stages, sometimes with a few years in a Southern city such as Memphis or Birmingham on the way. Asking what would have had to be sold shows how final the decision was.

Why did people from Mississippi end up in Chicago and people from Georgia in New York?

Why ask it

The railroad lines decided it. The Illinois Central ran from the Delta to Chicago, the lines up the Atlantic coast carried people from Florida, Georgia and the Carolinas to Washington, Philadelphia and New York, and in the 1940s families from Texas and Louisiana followed the rails and highways to California. Have each student trace one line on a map, and who lives where today starts to make sense.

What was it like to ride in the Jim Crow car?

Why ask it

Black passengers were put in a separate car, commonly the one nearest the engine with its smoke and cinders, and could not count on being served in the diner. That is where the shoebox lunch of fried chicken, boiled eggs and pound cake in so many family stories comes from. With a relative, ask what was in the box and who packed it.

Where did the segregated car end, and what did people remember about that moment?

Why ask it

On many routes the rule lapsed at a known point, such as the Ohio River or Washington, D.C., and passengers were free to take any seat. Memoirs describe everything from quiet relief to disbelief, and some people stayed put out of habit. It makes a good writing prompt: what would you have done when the train crossed?

Why did some people leave in secret?

Why ask it

A sharecropper said to owe money could be stopped from going, and a man who had crossed a white employer might have a day's head start at best. So families sold nothing, told no one, and bought tickets at a station a few towns down the line. It is the reason some family stories have no farewell in them.

How did families driving north or west find somewhere to eat, buy gas or sleep?

Why ask it

From 1936 the Negro Motorist Green Book listed hotels, restaurants and service stations that would serve Black travelers, and word of mouth covered what it missed. Many families simply drove through the night with their own food and bedding in the car. Libraries have digitized many editions, so a class can look up what was listed for its own town.

Arrival

Which cities grew the most, and where in each one did newcomers settle?

Why ask it

Chicago, Detroit, New York, Philadelphia, Cleveland, Pittsburgh and St. Louis in the first wave, joined by Los Angeles, Oakland and Seattle in the second. In each, newcomers were steered into a few districts: Harlem, the South Side of Chicago, Black Bottom in Detroit, the Hill in Pittsburgh. Find out what the district in your nearest city was called and what stands there now.

Who met a newcomer at the station, and who helped with a room and a job?

Why ask it

Usually a cousin or someone from the same county, and behind them the churches and the Urban League, whose workers met trains in some cities. People from one Southern town often filled one block or one congregation, and some formed hometown clubs. For a family interview the follow-up is the name of whoever was waiting on the platform.

How did Black families already living in the North receive the newcomers?

Why ask it

With help and with embarrassment. Longtime residents ran the churches and aid societies that took people in, and some also feared that country manners would cost them the footing they had won, which is why the Defender and the Urban League printed advice on dress and behavior. The question lets a group talk about class inside a community that outsiders treated as one thing.

How did white residents and city officials respond as Black neighborhoods grew?

Why ask it

Often with resistance at the edges: neighborhood associations, bombs thrown at houses bought across the line, police who looked away. In the summer of 1919 violence broke out in dozens of cities and towns, and in Chicago it began after Eugene Williams, a Black teenager, drifted toward a white beach and drowned when a man threw stones at him. Point out that this was the North, with no segregation statute on the books.

What did the North deliver, and where did it fall short?

Why ask it

Delivered: a pay envelope, a ballot, a high school, and no more stepping off the sidewalk. Fell short: where a family could live, which jobs it could hold, and how the police dealt with it. Have the group fill two columns, and distrust any answer that fills only one.

What did migrants bring with them that changed the cities?

Why ask it

Cooking, ways of talking, the habit of sitting out on the front steps of an evening, and a way of worshipping. Migrants who found the big Northern congregations too formal opened storefront churches run the way the church at home had been. Each person in the room can try to name one thing in their own city that came up from the South.

How was the move to the West Coast in the 1940s different?

Why ask it

It came later, drew mostly on Texas, Louisiana, Arkansas and Oklahoma, and was tied to shipyards and aircraft plants during the Second World War. The Black populations of Oakland, Richmond and Los Angeles multiplied within a few years, and housing ran out even faster than it had in the older destinations. Anyone who answers only about Chicago and Harlem has covered half the map.

Work and housing

What jobs were open to the new arrivals, and which were closed?

Why ask it

Men were hired into stockyards, steel mills, foundries, auto plants and rail yards, as a rule in the hottest, dirtiest and lowest-paid departments, and until the 1940s most women worked in domestic service or laundries. Skilled trades, sales counters and offices were largely shut. Answer it for one industry in one city, since what was true of Detroit was not true of Philadelphia.

How did wages in the North compare with what people had earned in the South?

Why ask it

The pay looked enormous from a cotton field, and the difference was real. So were Northern rent, coal, carfare and groceries, none of which a farm family had paid for in the same way. Set one wage beside one rent from the same city and year before deciding how much better off a household was.

Why were many unions closed to Black workers, and what changed that?

Why ask it

Many craft unions barred Black members outright, and employers took advantage by hiring Black workers during strikes, which deepened the bitterness on both sides. The picture shifted in the 1930s, when industrial unions began organizing whole plants regardless of race and A. Philip Randolph's Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters won a contract from the Pullman Company. A fair answer finds more than one party at fault.

What work did women do, and how did the move change their lives?

Why ask it

Most worked in other people's kitchens and nurseries, often hired by the day, because factory doors opened to them late and tended to close again when a war ended. Many came alone, ahead of a husband or children, and mailed money home. In a family interview, find out who minded the children while she worked.

What did the two world wars change for Black workers?

Why ask it

Each war produced a labor shortage that opened jobs once reserved for white workers. In 1941, with Randolph threatening to bring a mass march to Washington, President Roosevelt signed an order against discrimination in defense plants. The harder half of the question is what became of those jobs when the soldiers came home.

Why did Black families pay more rent for worse housing?

Why ask it

They were confined to a few districts while the number of people in them kept rising, so a landlord could cut an apartment into one-room kitchenettes and name the price. A family with the money to move still could not rent or buy past the boundary. Once a student sees it as a captive market, the rest of the housing story falls into place.

What were restrictive covenants and redlining?

Why ask it

A covenant was a clause in a deed forbidding sale or rental to Black buyers, and in 1948 the Supreme Court held that courts could not enforce one. Redlining is the name for lenders and federal housing agencies rating Black and mixed neighborhoods as poor risks, which made mortgages there hard to get. Old lending maps and deeds for many cities are public, so look at your own city's before discussing either in the abstract.

What happened when a Black family bought a house across the color line?

Why ask it

Sometimes nothing, and sometimes a crowd on the lawn. In Detroit in 1925 Dr. Ossian Sweet stood trial for murder after shots from his new house killed a man in the mob outside, and Lorraine Hansberry drew on her own family's Chicago court fight for A Raisin in the Sun. Reading the play alongside this question suits a class or a book group.

What became of the neighborhoods the migrants built?

Why ask it

Many were cut through or cleared in the 1950s and 1960s for expressways and urban renewal, Black Bottom in Detroit and much of Pittsburgh's Hill District among them. Others emptied as the plants that had drawn people closed or moved away. An older resident can often tell you what stood where the interchange is now, and that is worth an afternoon.

Legacy

How did the Great Migration change American music, art and writing?

Why ask it

Jazz traveled from New Orleans to Chicago and New York, the blues went electric, and gospel, rhythm and blues and Motown all grew up in migrant neighborhoods. The Harlem Renaissance of the 1920s took place in a district the migration had filled. Have each person bring one song, poem or painting and say where its maker's family came from.

What does Jacob Lawrence's Migration Series show, and what does it leave to the captions?

Why ask it

Lawrence, the son of migrants, painted sixty small panels in 1940 and 1941 from library research and from what he had heard growing up in Harlem. The pictures are flat and spare, and the captions carry the facts. Hand each student one panel to describe before reading its caption, then compare the two.

Why does The Warmth of Other Suns follow three people instead of telling one general story?

Why ask it

Isabel Wilkerson chose Ida Mae Gladney, who went from Mississippi to Chicago in the 1930s, George Starling, Florida to Harlem in the 1940s, and Robert Foster, Louisiana to Los Angeles in the 1950s, so between them they cover the main routes and three decades. A book group can argue over which of the three got the most of what they left for. People seldom agree, and the disagreement is the discussion.

How did the migration change politics in the North and in Washington?

Why ask it

People who could not vote in Mississippi could vote in Illinois, and in 1928 the South Side of Chicago sent Oscar De Priest to Congress, the first Black member elected from a Northern state. As those voters grew in number, both parties had to bargain for them. That is the thread from a train ticket bought in 1920 to a civil rights bill in the 1960s.

What did the South lose, and how did it respond?

Why ask it

It lost field hands, church members, teachers, customers and, in time, some of its grip on the people who remained. Some planters raised pay, others turned to machines, and from the late 1940s the mechanical cotton picker began removing much of the work that had held families on the land. Historians still argue over whether the machine pushed people out or replaced those already gone, so let a class argue it too.

How did the migration feed the civil rights movement?

Why ask it

Northern Black voters, newspapers, congregations and union locals supplied money, lawyers, publicity and pressure on Congress. The two regions stayed tied by family: Emmett Till's mother had been carried north from Mississippi as a small child, and in 1955 she put her son on a train to spend part of the summer with her relatives there. A strong answer connects North and South through kin and not only through leaders.

Did the migrants do better than those who stayed, and did their children?

Why ask it

There is no single answer, which is why it suits a seminar. Migrants generally earned more and gained the vote and longer schooling, while their children and grandchildren met the loss of factory work and neighborhoods starved of investment. Make anyone who answers say which generation and which decade they are talking about.

How was the Great Migration like immigration from abroad, and how was it different?

Why ask it

Alike: relatives sending for relatives, hometown clubs, the worst jobs first, children who lost the old accent. Different: these were citizens moving inside their own country, and they could not fade into the white majority after a generation as European immigrants did. Wilkerson likens them to people seeking political asylum, a comparison a group can test against the reasons migrants gave.

Why did the migration wind down around 1970?

Why ask it

The civil rights laws had taken apart the legal order people had fled, Southern cities were growing, and Northern factory jobs were disappearing. Since the 1970s the net flow of Black Americans has run toward the South. Students can rank the three reasons and say what evidence would change the ranking.

What is the reverse migration, and what is drawing people back to the South?

Why ask it

For decades now Black Americans, many of them grandchildren of migrants, have been moving to Atlanta, Houston, Dallas, Charlotte and smaller Southern places. The reasons they give include jobs, cheaper houses, family land, retirement and a feeling of home. If someone in your family has made that move, set their reasons beside the reasons their grandparents left.

Why did the Great Migration get so little attention for so long?

Why ask it

It had no leader, no single date and no monument, and the people who lived it often said little about what they had left behind. Many children of migrants report learning the story late, or piecing it together from a place name and a recipe. Go around the room and have everyone say where they first heard of it, and whether that was in school.

Where can you see the Great Migration in your own town today?

Why ask it

In a Northern or Western city, look at church cornerstones, the founding year of a Black newspaper or high school, a hometown club, a row of Southern restaurants. In a Southern town look for the opposite: the congregation that shrank, the farm that was sold. Nobody can answer this one from a textbook, so start in the local history room of the public library.

Interview

Before we start, may I record this, and who in the family should get a copy?

Why ask it

A family recording outlives the project it was made for, so settle at the start who keeps it, and name relatives in two different households. Say whether a teacher or an archive will hear it as well. If one will, ask that institution which consent form it uses before the day, because each has its own.

Who was the first person in our family to leave the South, and about what year?

Why ask it

You are after a name and a rough date, even if the date is only 'before the war' or 'the year the baby came'. With a name and a decade you can look for the person in the census on both sides of the move. When your relative is unsure, the useful follow-up is who else would know.

What town and county did the family come from, and what was life like for them there?

Why ask it

Get the county as well as the town, and the spelling, since small places share names and some have dropped off the map. Then ask whose land they worked, what was grown and which church they belonged to. Most Southern records are filed by county, so this one answer decides where you search.

What reason was given for leaving, and was there one that people only said quietly?

Why ask it

Families often keep an official version, such as better work, and a second that surfaced decades later: a threat, a beating, a debt, something done to a relative. Do not push for the second. Leave a pause, then write down exactly what is offered and who it came from.

Why this city, and who was already here?

Why ask it

The answer is nearly always a person: a brother, an aunt, a neighbor from the home church. That person is the link in the chain, and others from the same county very likely came up behind them. Ask what became of them, and whether their descendants are still in touch.

Who was sent for later, and were any children left with relatives in the meantime?

Why ask it

Children were often left with a grandmother for a year or more while the parents got settled, and that separation can still be tender. Put the question to the oldest sibling if you can. The order of arrival also explains gaps that will puzzle you later in school and census records.

What do you remember, or what were you told, about the trip itself?

Why ask it

Listen for the station, the time of day, what was carried and what was eaten on the way. Someone who was a child then may give you what the adults forgot: the dark outside the window, being told to hush. One small detail, such as a cardboard suitcase tied shut with rope, is what a later reader will hold on to.

Where did the family live first in this city, and who else was in the house?

Why ask it

Newcomers commonly boarded with kin or rented one room of somebody else's flat, so the first address may be under another surname. Get the street, the nearest cross street and the church they walked to. A city directory or a census page can then show you who the neighbors were.

What was the first job here, and how did they get it?

Why ask it

Ask for the employer's name and the department as well as the trade. How the job was found matters just as much: a foreman from the same county, a deacon, a line at the plant gate before dawn. If it was your relative's own first job, ask what they did with the first pay envelope.

What surprised them about the North, for better and for worse?

Why ask it

The good surprises tend to be small and physical: any seat on the streetcar, being called Mr. or Mrs., a school with new books. The bad ones are the cold, the crowding and a color line that nobody had bothered to post a sign for. Get one of each so the story comes out as neither all triumph nor all disappointment.

What came north with the family: recipes, sayings, a church, a way of doing things?

Why ask it

This suits a reluctant talker and is best asked in the kitchen. Write down the dish, who cooked it and what it was called at home. Words and habits a family thinks of as its own often turn out to belong to one county.

Did you go back South for visits or summers, and what were you told before you went?

Why ask it

Many Northern children spent summers with grandparents and were coached first on how to address white adults and which places to stay away from. That coaching is how a child raised in Chicago or Newark learned what the parents had left. Ask what they loved about those summers as well, because most of them did.

Which branch of the family never left, and what happened to the land or the house?

Why ask it

Every family that moved has a branch that did not. Find out who lives there now, who pays the taxes on any land and who is buried in the home churchyard. Where ownership of property is unclear, take it to a lawyer in that state, since family memory will not settle a title.

If our side of the family stayed in the South, who left, and how were they talked about at home?

Why ask it

A family in Georgia or Mississippi holds the other half of the story: the empty pew, the letter with a money order folded inside, the cousins who drove down every August in a new car. Ask whether the ones who left were envied, resented or missed. You will probably hear all three.

Who has the funeral programs, the family Bible or the letters that went back and forth?

Why ask it

In many Black families a funeral program is the fullest written record there is: a birthplace, the parents' names, the year someone came north, a list of survivors. Ask to photograph and never to borrow. Find out who keeps the collection now and who is meant to have it next.

As the family saw it, was the move worth it?

Why ask it

Keep it for the end. People weigh it against particular things: the house their parents were finally able to buy, the cousin who stayed and kept the land, forty winters. Ask what the yes is made of and what the no is made of, then whether their own parents would have answered the same way.

Working through the Great Migration questions with a map, a book or a relative

Practical guidance for the conversation itself

With a class or a book group

Start from a rail map

Put up a map of the eastern United States and mark the Illinois Central, the lines up the Atlantic seaboard and the roads west from Texas and Louisiana. A good share of the Leaving and Journey questions answer themselves once people can see that a family in the Delta lived on a track that ended in Chicago. Keep the map up for the later groups and add each city as it is mentioned.

Give everyone one migrant

Assign each student or reader a real person: the writer of one published migrant letter, one of Wilkerson's three, a musician, a figure from a Lawrence panel. Take the questions as that person would have met them. It keeps the talk on decisions someone had to make and off phrases like 'push and pull factors'.

Stay with one city

The story in Detroit is auto plants and a housing shortage, in Pittsburgh steel, in Oakland shipyards and a wartime boom. Choose the city nearest you, or the one in the book, and keep to it through Arrival and Work and housing. Bring in a second city only at the end, for comparison.

Pace it by the reading

The list runs in the order most books on the subject do, Wilkerson's included: the South first, then the leaving, the cities and the aftermath. A group that meets several times can take whichever tagged group matches the pages just read. With a single class period, choose one question from each of the first five groups, so that students follow one arc from the farm to the city and beyond, and send the Interview group home as an assignment.

For elementary and middle grades

Children know what moving is. Begin with what you would pack in one suitcase, who you would miss and who would be waiting, then use the Lawrence panels, whose flat shapes and short captions a child can follow. Say plainly that families left because they were not safe and were not paid fairly. How much of the violence to describe, and in which grade, is for your school or district to say, so ask before the unit starts.

With a relative whose family made the move

Know whose memory you are getting

The last large groups of migrants went north and west in the 1960s, so most relatives you can sit with now made the trip as children or were born after it. A child remembers the train, the lunch and the cold of the first winter, and usually cannot say why the adults decided to go. Put the journey questions to them as witnesses, and for the reasons ask what they were told and who told them.

Bring an atlas and a photograph

A road atlas opened to the home state does more than a list of questions. Let your relative put a finger on the county, then on the towns between there and here. An old photograph on the table works the same way, and both give a shy person something to look at besides you.

When the reason for leaving was violence

Some families went north after a threat or an attack, and some elders have kept that from the children for a lifetime. Offer the question about quieter reasons once, wait, and if it is turned down go on to the journey. Should the story come to you later from another relative, treat it with the same care and say where you heard it.

Call the branch that stayed

The interview is half done until you have talked to someone in the home county: a great-aunt, a cousin, the person who keeps the church records. They can tell you how the leaving looked from the porch and who came back for funerals. Ask your relative for an introduction before you phone.

Keep the sessions short

Forty-five minutes is plenty for someone in their eighties or nineties, and two short visits will give you more than one long one. End on the question about what came north with the family or the one about summers, which are pleasant to answer. Leave the recorder running while you pack up, with permission, because the best story often arrives at the door.

Ways the story gets flattened

The North as the promised land

It is tempting to end the telling when the train pulls into Chicago. Migrants themselves were divided about what they found, and some of them went back. Make room for the kitchenette, the closed union hall and the covenant alongside the pay envelope and the ballot.

Migrants as people things happened to

It is easy to describe six million people as pushed by one force and pulled by another. Each of them weighed it, saved for it and chose a day. Whenever an answer has no decision in it, ask who decided, and what they gave up to go.

One wave and one city

Harlem in the 1920s is the best-known chapter and a small part of the whole: the second wave was the larger one, and the West Coast story does not begin in earnest until the 1940s. Before you finish, answer at least one question for the 1940s or 1950s and one for a city west of the Mississippi.

Correcting a family story to fit the pattern

Your relative's account may not match the textbook: the family left in 1962, went to Milwaukee by way of St. Louis, and moved because of a quarrel with a brother. Write it down as told. The general pattern is an average of stories like that one, and the exception is usually the part worth keeping.

Following a family's move through the records

Census returns and draft cards

United States census returns open to the public 72 years after they are taken, so those through 1950 can be searched by name. Each gives a person's state of birth, and the 1940 census also asked where the person had been living in 1935, which can catch a household in the middle of its move. Draft registration cards from the two world wars often add a birthplace and an employer. Which databases you can use free depends on your library, so ask at the desk.

City directories and the first address

Directories were printed most years for the larger cities and list a name, an address and often an occupation. Looking the family up year by year shows when they first appear, how often they moved and who else from the home county lived on the block. A local history librarian will know which years survive for your city.

The Black press

The Chicago Defender, the Pittsburgh Courier, the Baltimore Afro-American and papers like them ran columns of news from Southern hometowns and notices of who was visiting whom. A grandmother's trip home for a funeral may be in print. Many of these papers have been digitized, and access varies by library and by state.

Put the route on one page

Draw the family's move as a line: home county, any stops, the first address in the new city, the dates as closely as you know them, and beside each the name of whoever told you. Take it to the next reunion and invite corrections. Somebody will add a stop you had not heard of.

More on this topic