Skip to content
Professional & Academic

Questions to Ask New Employees After 90 Days

Questions for a manager or HR partner running a 90 day check-in with a new hire, covering how the job compares to the pitch, what onboarding missed, where they are still blocked, how clear their goals are, and whether anything has already made them think about leaving.

20 questions, each with the reason to ask it · includes a conversation guide

The questions

Open any question to see why it works.

  1. 1

    Now that you have been doing it, how does the job compare with what you thought you were hired to do?

    Ninety days is the last point at which someone can still remember the job description clearly. The gap they describe is the most reliable feedback you will ever get on your own hiring pitch, and it usually shows up again in exit interviews if nobody fixes it.

  2. 2

    What surprised you in the first month that nobody warned you about?

    Surprises fade quickly once they become normal, so this is genuinely a use-it-or-lose-it question. Answers tend to be small and structural, such as how approvals really work or which meeting is the one that matters, and they are exactly what the next hire needs told.

  3. 3

    Which parts of onboarding were useful, and which parts could be deleted?

    Asking what to delete gets far better information than asking what to improve, because people are more comfortable naming waste than criticising someone's work. Watch for the training everyone completes and nobody remembers.

  4. 4

    Who has been most helpful to you, and how did you find them?

    This surfaces your informal support network, which is rarely the buddy you assigned. If they name someone from a different team, that person is quietly carrying onboarding work nobody has credited them for. If they cannot name anyone, that is the finding.

  5. 5

    Is there anything you are still waiting on: access, equipment, a system, an introduction?

    New hires stop asking after the second or third time and start working around the gap instead. Ask explicitly at ninety days and you will usually uncover at least one permission or tool they have quietly been borrowing from a colleague.

  6. 6

    What do you spend the most hours on in a typical week?

    Compare the answer with what you think you hired them for. A mismatch this early is not a performance problem, it is a role design problem, and it is much cheaper to correct now than after they have built their reputation around the wrong work.

  7. 7

    What are you doing that you think someone else should be doing?

    New people can still see which tasks landed on them by accident rather than by design. Long-tenured staff lose that sight entirely. Even if you change nothing, you learn which work has drifted to whoever is newest.

  8. 8

    Where do you still have to ask permission before you can act?

    This is the clearest measure of how autonomous someone actually is, and it is usually more restrictive than either of you assumed. Look for approvals that exist out of habit rather than risk, since those are the easiest early wins you can hand them.

  9. 9

    How would you describe what success looks like in your role six months from now?

    Do not correct them until they have finished. Whatever they say is what they have inferred from your behaviour, your priorities and your meetings, and any distance from your own answer is a communication gap you created, not one they invented.

  10. 10

    What have you gotten wrong so far, and how did you find out?

    The second half is the important half. If they only learned about mistakes by stumbling on them weeks later, your feedback loops are too slow. If they cannot name anything at all at ninety days, they are probably being kept away from real work.

  11. 11

    When you have a question, who do you go to first, and how long does an answer usually take?

    Response time is a hidden tax on new hires and it varies enormously by team. If the honest answer is that they search old messages or guess rather than ask, you have found something that will slow them down for their entire tenure.

  12. 12

    How much of your week is meetings you would not have scheduled yourself?

    New employees inherit calendar invitations from whoever held the role before, including recurring meetings that outlived their purpose. Ninety days in they know which ones are useless but do not yet feel able to decline. Give them the permission explicitly.

  13. 13

    What did we describe accurately during hiring, and what did we not?

    Framing it as both halves makes the criticism sayable. Common misses are pace, how much of the job is coordination, and how mature the tools are. Take this straight to whoever writes your job adverts, because it predicts your next hire's first ninety days.

  14. 14

    What have you noticed here that people who have been around a while seem to have stopped noticing?

    This is the highest-value question on the list and it has a short shelf life, since by month six they will have stopped noticing too. Expect answers about tone in meetings, a process everyone complains about, or a habit that reads badly to outsiders.

  15. 15

    Has anything happened that felt off to you, even if it seemed minor?

    New people see conduct issues before anyone else and almost never report them unprompted, because they do not yet know what is normal here. Ask calmly, take notes, and do not defend anyone in the moment. Your reaction determines whether they ever tell you anything again.

  16. 16

    How do you like to get feedback, and have you had enough of it?

    Most new hires at ninety days have had far less than they wanted, and the ones performing well have often had none at all because there was nothing to correct. Ask about frequency and setting, not just style, since some people want it immediately and privately rather than in a review.

  17. 17

    What would you change if you had the authority?

    The wording matters: it removes the need to be diplomatic about who owns the thing. If they name something inside their own remit, tell them to go ahead, because a ninety day check-in that ends with a granted change buys you far more candour later.

  18. 18

    What do you want to be doing a year from now?

    Ambitions formed in the first quarter are usually still negotiable and often modest, such as owning one area outright. Writing it down now gives you something concrete to point at during review season, and it flags early if the role has no version of what they want.

  19. 19

    Is there anything making you wonder whether this was the right move?

    Ask it plainly and then stay quiet. Early doubt is common, usually fixable, and almost never volunteered. Most people who leave inside a year could name the reason at ninety days, and the manager was the last to hear it.

  20. 20

    What should I be doing differently as your manager?

    Ask this last, when the conversation has warmed up, and expect a soft answer the first time. Say you will ask again next month and then actually do it. The second answer is the real one, and asking twice is what makes the invitation credible.

Running the 90 day check-in

Practical guidance for the conversation itself.

Setting it up

Separate it from any review

If this conversation is attached to probation confirmation, pay, or a performance rating, you will get a careful new employee giving you careful answers. Confirm their status in a different conversation, ideally before this one, and open by saying plainly that this meeting is about how the job and the company are working, not about how they are doing.

Send two or three questions ahead

People who process by thinking rather than talking will give you far more if they have seen the questions. Send the ones about onboarding, blockers and what they would change. Keep the questions about doubt and about your own management for the room, because those depend on tone.

Book longer than you need and go somewhere else

Forty five minutes in a booked room with a hard stop produces short answers. An hour with slack in it, away from their desk and yours, produces the second half of answers. The useful material in these conversations almost always arrives after the halfway mark.

What to do with the answers

  1. 1Within a week, send them a short written summary of what you heard and what you will act on. Nothing kills future candour faster than a check-in that visibly went nowhere.
  2. 2Split the answers into three lists: things you can fix this month, things you will escalate, and things that will not change. Tell them which is which, including the third list.
  3. 3Fix one small thing immediately, ideally something they mentioned about access, tooling or a pointless meeting. Speed is more persuasive than scale.
  4. 4Feed the onboarding and hiring answers to whoever owns those processes, with the employee's name removed unless they agreed otherwise.
  5. 5Put a follow-up in the calendar for a month out and ask the last question again.

Common mistakes at 90 days

  • Turning it into a status update on their projects, which is what will happen by default if you do not steer.
  • Defending the company in the moment. Explaining why a frustration exists is the fastest way to teach someone not to mention the next one.
  • Asking only positive-framed questions and concluding everything is fine.
  • Doing it late. At six months the new-eyes advantage is gone and the answers become the same ones your long-tenured staff give.
  • Taking notes on a laptop across the table, which changes what people are willing to say. Write on paper or write it up afterwards.
  • Treating a good check-in as a substitute for regular one to ones rather than a supplement to them.