Survey Questions to Ask After Training
Survey questions to ask after training, for whoever has to write the feedback form: the person who ran the session, a learning and development team, or a manager who sent people on a course. They are grouped in the order a post-training survey usually runs: the overall verdict, the content and what was learned, the trainer, delivery, and how ready people feel to use it at work, followed by a separate set for the follow-up about a month later. No single form should carry all of them, so choose the dozen or so that match the decisions you have to make.
Want questions from the whole vault instead? Try the random question generator.
The questions
Each question, and why to ask it
Overall
Overall, how would you rate this training?
Why ask it
Put it first, on five points from poor to excellent, before questions about the room or the slides pull the answer one way. It is the figure to compare from one run of the course to the next, and it means little without the rest: a session can be enjoyed and still change nothing back at work.
What is the main reason behind your overall rating?
Why ask it
An open box placed directly under the rating. Read the replies in two piles, the low scores and the high ones: the first pile is your repair list, and the second tells you what not to cut when someone asks for a shorter version.
How likely are you to recommend this training to a colleague who does similar work?
Why ask it
The words 'similar work' are there on purpose: someone can rate the day highly and still know it would be wasted on most of their team. Score it from 0 to 10 with both ends labeled. When people who rated the session well give a low number here, look at who was invited before you look at the course.
Was the training a good use of your working time?
Why ask it
Most participants have work waiting when they get back, so this asks about the trade and not about enjoyment. Three choices are enough: yes, partly or no. A large share of 'partly' can mean a half day of material was stretched over a full one.
Which part of the training was most useful for your job?
Why ask it
List the modules or agenda items as choices so nobody has to recall a title, and allow one pick. The part that wins is the part to protect when the session has to lose an hour.
If you could change one thing about this training, what would it be?
Why ask it
Asking for one thing forces a choice, and a choice is easier to act on than a list of everything that could be better. Leave it as an open line and count how often the same change comes up. When a quarter of the group names the same fix without being prompted, make it before the next run.
Which part was least useful, and what would you have wanted in its place?
Why ask it
Reuse the pick list of modules from the most-useful question, add 'none of it' so people are not pushed into naming something, and give the second half a short box. That box is where the value is: a replacement named by several people is the start of the next version's agenda.
Did the training cover what the invitation or course description said it would?
Why ask it
This is the answerable version of 'did it meet your expectations', which cannot tell you what anyone expected. Offer yes, mostly and no, with a box on 'no' for what was missing. A run of 'no' beside good ratings elsewhere points at the description, which is cheaper to fix than the course.
What brought you to this training: your own choice, a manager's suggestion, or a requirement?
Why ask it
It is a split, not a score: one pick from the three choices in the question. People who were sent and people who signed up often judge the same day differently, so compare the two groups before deciding the course itself has slipped. Leave it off the form if enrollment records already show it.
Content
How relevant was the training to the work you do day to day?
Why ask it
Use five points from not at all relevant to very relevant; the words 'day to day' keep people from answering about a job they might hold someday. Low relevance with a high overall rating describes a good course given to the wrong audience, so the fix is in who gets invited. If the scores divide by job title, consider running two versions.
How clear was it, at the start, what you were expected to be able to do by the end?
Why ask it
When this scores low, the answers about whether objectives were met are guesses, since people are judging against a target they never saw. Rate it from not at all clear to very clear. The repair is small: one slide and two minutes at the opening.
How well did the training meet each of the objectives listed below?
Why ask it
Build a grid with one row per objective, copied word for word from the course outline, and a scale from not met to fully met. One objective scoring well under the others shows which module to rework, which a single 'the objectives were met' item never can.
Was the level of the material too basic, about right, or too advanced for your experience?
Why ask it
A three-way choice tells you which direction to move, where a rating would only say something was off. If the room splits between 'too basic' and 'too advanced', the course may be fine and the group was mixed: sort people by experience next time or send a primer beforehand.
How much of the material was new to you?
Why ask it
'Almost none' from experienced staff on a refresher is expected. The same answer on a course billed as new skills suggests it repeats what an earlier one taught. The choices run almost none, some, about half, most and nearly all.
How would you rate your skill in [topic] before the training, and how would you rate it now?
Why ask it
Two rows on one scale, from beginner to expert, both answered after the session. Asked beforehand, people can only guess at what the subject involves; asked at the end, they judge both points with the same understanding. It is still a self-report, so treat the gap as an impression and not a test result.
What is the most important thing you learned?
Why ask it
Set the replies beside the course's first objective. When most people name something else, either the main point was buried or a side topic was the real draw, and a reply such as 'lots of things' suggests nothing stuck firmly. One open line is enough room.
Which topic needed more time, and which could have had less?
Why ask it
Give two pick lists of the agenda items, each with a 'none' option. The answers come as a pair, which lets you rebalance the schedule without making the day longer.
How closely did the examples and scenarios match situations you meet in your job?
Why ask it
A bought-in course can score well for content and poorly here, on a scale from not at all closely to very closely. The remedy is a briefing: give the provider your terms, your systems and two or three real cases before the next run, and ask how much tailoring their fee includes.
What question do you still have that the training did not answer?
Why ask it
Forward the replies to the trainer within the week: one short email answering them reaches everyone who was wondering the same thing. A question that recurs marks a gap to close in the material. Keep the box optional, since plenty of people will have nothing to put in it.
If [a situation the course covered] came up tomorrow, what would you do first?
Why ask it
This is a knowledge check dressed as a survey question: write three or four plausible options, one of which is what the course taught. It measures what was learned, where the ratings around it measure what was felt. Two or three of these are plenty, and tell people it is not graded.
Trainer
How well did the trainer know the subject?
Why ask it
Rate it from not at all well to very well. A dip here can follow a trainer covering someone else's material, or a group more experienced than the trainer was told to expect, so find out how the trainer was briefed before you draw a conclusion about them.
How clearly did the trainer explain the material?
Why ask it
Give it a row of its own, from not at all clearly to very clearly, because experts are often the ones who skip steps. High knowledge with low clarity is a coaching matter for the trainer, not a reason to replace them.
How well did the trainer handle questions from the group?
Why ask it
Alongside the usual rating points, add 'no questions were asked' and look at how many choose it. A session where nobody asked anything was either pitched perfectly or left no room, and the pace answers will say which.
How well did the trainer keep you involved during the session?
Why ask it
Read the score against the time of day and the length of the session before judging the person: the slot after lunch on a second day is hard for any trainer. It takes the same five points as the other trainer rows, not at all well to very well.
How well did the trainer manage the time?
Why ask it
This row is about the clock: starting on time, coming back from breaks, reaching the final topic. Rate it from not at all well to very well. A low score together with 'too fast' on the last module means the session ran out of road, and the final objective got the thinnest treatment.
Did you feel comfortable saying so when you did not understand something?
Why ask it
It matters most where a manager sat in the room or the group mixed senior and junior staff, since people may stay quiet to avoid looking slow. Give three choices: yes, mostly, no. A cluster of 'no' casts doubt on the confident answers further down the form.
What should the trainer keep doing, and what should they change?
Why ask it
Two short boxes, one for each half. Asking for something to keep first makes the criticism that follows more specific and easier for the trainer to read. Before passing comments on as written, ask how your organization handles anonymous feedback about named staff.
Delivery
How was the pace of the training: too slow, about right, or too fast?
Why ask it
Three choices, not a scale. 'Too fast' gathered on one module means that module needs more time or a prerequisite. 'Too fast' across the whole day means the agenda holds more than the hours allow.
Was the training too short, about right, or too long for what it covered?
Why ask it
Length and pace are different complaints, which is why both are asked. A session can drag and still end before people had practiced enough. 'Too long' from most of the room is the easiest finding to take to whoever approves the time away from work.
How was the balance between listening and doing?
Why ask it
Offer too much presentation, about right and too much activity. A skills course that scores 'too much presentation' was a lecture about a skill. Awareness or compliance sessions can lean that way without much harm.
Did you get enough time to practice during the session?
Why ask it
On a software or equipment course, a majority of 'no' is a warning that help requests will follow in the first week back, so set up a drop-in hour before you rewrite anything. Offer yes and no, plus 'there was nothing to practice' for briefings.
How useful were the exercises, role plays or group activities?
Why ask it
Rate from not useful to very useful and add 'did not take part'. Ask for the name of the weakest activity in a comment line: an exercise can fail because the instructions were unclear, which is a ten-minute fix, or because it had nothing to do with the job, which is not.
How clear and easy to follow were the slides, handouts or workbook?
Why ask it
Rate it from not at all clear to very clear, with 'there were none' as a way out. Ask people to judge the materials by themselves and not the trainer's talk over them: slides that needed the trainer to make sense will not help anyone who opens them alone three weeks later.
How likely are you to go back to the handouts, slides or workbook once you are at work?
Why ask it
Material nobody expects to open again was written for the classroom and not for the desk, and a one-page checklist can do more than a full slide deck emailed afterward. Use a likelihood scale, very unlikely to very likely, and compare it with the clarity row. Clear but never reopened means the content is fine and the format is wrong.
How much of the pre-work did you complete before the session?
Why ask it
Options: no pre-work was set, all of it, part of it, I did not get to it. If most people arrived without having done it, the trainer probably spent the first hour catching them up, and the pace complaints trace back to here. Find out how many days' notice people had before blaming them.
Were you able to give the training your full attention?
Why ask it
The finding here is for managers, not the trainer: a course cannot be judged fairly on a day when half the room was answering email. Offer yes, mostly and no, then ask what pulled people away, such as calls, messages or a shift to cover.
How would you rate each of these: the room, the equipment, the time of day and the breaks?
Why ask it
A grid on a poor-to-excellent scale, with 'does not apply' for anyone who joined remotely. Keep it to one grid so logistics take thirty seconds of the form. Scores here seldom explain a weak course, but a cold room or a dead projector can explain one bad afternoon.
Did you have what you needed to take part fully, such as captions, an accessible room or materials in a format you can use?
Why ask it
Yes or no, with a box for what was missing, set apart from the logistics grid so it is not skimmed past. On a named form, reply to the person directly and put it right before their next session. What an employer or training provider has to arrange differs by country and by organization, so ask HR how it works where you are.
If you took the training online, did anything technical get in the way of learning?
Why ask it
Show it only to remote or self-paced learners: yes or no, then a box for what failed. Separate the causes when you read it. A platform fault is yours to fix; a login or network block is a question for whoever runs IT at the participant's site.
Applying it
How confident are you that you can use what you learned in your job?
Why ask it
Five points from not at all confident to very confident. Of everything on the day-of form, this is the item closest to what happens next, so report it beside the overall rating. High satisfaction with low confidence describes an enjoyable day that needed more practice.
What is the first thing you plan to do differently because of this training?
Why ask it
A specific answer, with a task and a setting in it, is a small commitment the person has now written down. Leave it as open text, and on a named form quote it back in the follow-up survey and ask whether it happened.
When do you expect to first use what you learned?
Why ask it
Choices: this week, this month, within three months, not sure, I do not expect to. A skill left unused for months tends to fade, so a room full of 'within three months' is an argument for moving the course closer to the rollout or the busy season it prepares for.
What might get in the way of using what you learned?
Why ask it
Checkboxes, several allowed: not enough time, no chance to use it in my role, the systems do not support it, my manager works differently, I need more practice, nothing. Most of these sit outside the classroom. Send the tally to the managers involved, because more training will not remove them.
What would help you put this into practice?
Why ask it
Offer a pick list of things you can provide: a checklist or job aid, a short refresher, time with a manager, someone to ask, access to the tool. List only what is on offer. A wish list you cannot fund teaches people that the form is decoration.
Before the training, did you and your manager talk about why you were attending?
Why ask it
Yes or no, plus 'I chose it myself and did not need to' so volunteers have an answer. A manager who never discussed the course may not think to ask about it afterward, and what nobody asks for tends to lapse. Where 'no' is common, send managers a half-page summary of what was taught on the same day.
What other training would help you in your job right now?
Why ask it
One optional open line near the end. It is no substitute for a needs assessment, but people fresh from a course can often see the next gap: the prerequisite they lacked, or the advanced session this one pointed to. Pass the tally to whoever plans the training calendar, and promise nothing on the form.
Is there anything else about the training you want us to know?
Why ask it
The closing question of the day-of form, open and optional. It catches what had no row: an access problem, a remark that made someone uncomfortable, praise for a colleague who helped. Have one named person read every reply within a few days.
A month later
Since the training, how often have you used what you learned?
Why ask it
Send this three to six weeks on, with the choices not yet, once or twice, several times, and it is now how I work. It records behavior, which the day-of form could only forecast. Compare it with the confidence scores from the first form to see whether confidence was a fair guide for this course.
What is one example of something you did differently because of the training?
Why ask it
Ask for a single real instance in an open box. Examples are the evidence a budget holder believes, and they show which module is doing the work. Check with the writer before repeating one with a name attached.
If you have not used it yet, what is the main reason?
Why ask it
Show it only to people who answered 'not yet', as one choice from the same obstacle list the first form used. Now the answers are fact and not prediction. 'No opportunity' points to timing or to who was enrolled; 'my manager works differently' is a conversation above the trainer's level.
Compared with the day of the training, how confident are you now in [skill]?
Why ask it
More confident, about the same or less confident. 'Less' is not always bad news: trying a skill on real work shows people how much there is to it. Pair it with the usage question, since less confident and never used is the result that calls for a refresher.
Has your manager talked with you about how you are using the training?
Why ask it
A yes or no about an event, which is steadier than asking whether people feel supported. Where the answer is mostly 'no', look at whether usage is lower in the same teams. If it is, the next investment belongs in briefing managers and not in the course.
What has changed in your results since you started using it?
Why ask it
Give choices that fit the course, such as faster, fewer errors, fewer escalations, better conversations with customers, no change yet, plus an 'other' line. These are perceptions. Where the course was meant to move a number, check the number itself with whoever owns that data.
Looking back, which part of the training has been most useful, and which have you not needed?
Why ask it
Two pick lists of the modules. The day-of favorite is often the liveliest session; the one-month favorite is the one that survived contact with the job. A module nobody has needed after several groups have been through is a candidate to cut or make optional.
What do you wish the training had covered, now that you have tried to apply it?
Why ask it
People could not answer this on the day because they did not yet know where they would get stuck. Give it an open box and send the replies to whoever owns the course content, since they describe the gaps that only showed up on the job.
A month on, was the training worth the time it took?
Why ask it
It repeats the day-of question about working time, with the same yes, partly or no, so the two can be laid side by side. A slide from 'yes' to 'partly' once the good mood of the day has gone is the more honest reading. A rise is worth a look too: it can belong to a course that felt hard at the time and paid off later.
How to build a post-training survey people will finish
Practical guidance for the conversation itself
Before you build the form
Write down what the results will decide
List the calls that depend on this survey: whether the course runs again, whether the provider is kept, what gets cut, who should be enrolled next time. A question that feeds none of them can go. If the only use is a satisfaction figure for a quarterly report, three questions will do.
Plan two forms, not one long one
The form filled in as the session ends can measure reaction and confidence. Whether anyone used the training cannot be known that day. Schedule the follow-up before the course runs, tell participants it is coming, and keep it to five or six questions from A month later.
Know which level each question reaches
Training evaluation is often described in four levels, known as the Kirkpatrick model: how people reacted, what they learned, whether their behavior changed, and what that did for results. Overall, Trainer and Delivery are reaction. Content adds a little learning, Applying it looks ahead to behavior, and A month later asks about behavior and results. A survey collects only what people report, so for learning and results pair it with a test, an observation or the business figure where one exists.
Pick twelve to fifteen for the day-of form
A workable core is ten items: the overall rating and the reason for it, the relevance and level questions from Content, two rows about the trainer, pace, the confidence rating, the obstacles checklist and the one-change question. Add up to five from the rest where the course calls for it: the technical question for remote sessions, the practice question for hands-on skills, the pre-work question when some was set.
Settle whether replies carry a name
Unnamed forms tend to draw franker comments about a trainer or a compulsory course. Named forms let you match each person's day-of answers to their follow-up and reply to a problem. Say which it is on the first screen. What may be stored about staff, and for how long, differs by employer and by country, so ask HR or whoever handles data where you work before the form goes out.
Scales and wording
One rating scale, the same way round
Choose five points, label each one, and keep the positive end on the same side for every rating on the form. Someone filling it in on a phone as a long day closes is likely to stop reading the labels after the first few items, and a scale that flips halfway gives you answers that mean the opposite of what was intended.
A three-way choice when you need a direction
Pace, length, level and the balance of listening and doing can each be wrong in two directions. 'Too slow, about right, too fast' says which way to move. Three out of five for pace says only that something is off.
Questions or agreement statements, not a mixture
Some organizations word every item as a statement to agree or disagree with, such as 'The trainer explained the material clearly'. Every rating on this page can be recast that way. Pick one style for the whole form, because switching between agreement scales and quality scales is where people start ticking without reading.
One idea per row
'The trainer was knowledgeable and engaging' cannot be answered by someone who thought one and not the other. Split it into two rows. The same goes for 'materials and activities' and for 'relevant and useful'. Where a question on this page asks two things, such as what to keep and what to change, build it as two rows or two boxes under one heading.
Fill the brackets with the course's own words
Where a question shows [topic] or [skill], use the name from the course outline, and copy the objectives exactly as participants saw them. Nobody should have to work out which part of the day a row is about.
Give every rating a way out
'Does not apply', 'did not take part' and 'there were none' keep people from inventing a score for an exercise they missed or a handout that never arrived. Leave those answers out of the average and report how many chose them.
Running the one-month follow-up
Choosing the date
Three to six weeks suits most courses: long enough for a chance to use the skill, short enough that the session is still remembered. Push it later when the skill belongs to a cycle, such as a year-end close or a seasonal rush, and send it after the first time people would have needed it.
Carry the first form forward
If the forms are named, show each person the action they wrote on the day and ask whether it happened. If they are not, repeat the wording of the items you want to compare, confidence above all, so the two rounds line up as groups.
Expect fewer replies
The follow-up arrives when the course is no longer on anyone's mind. A short form, a note from the participant's own manager and one line about what changed after the last survey all help. Put the number of replies next to every figure you report, so nobody reads eight answers as the view of sixty people.
Ask the manager one thing too
A participant can say they use the skill; their manager can say whether they have seen it. A two-line message asking what, if anything, looks different in the person's work adds a second view without a second survey. Whether managers may be asked about named staff this way is for your organization to decide, so check first.
Report the two rounds together
Lay the day-of confidence rating beside the one-month usage figure for each course. The pairs worth a conversation are the ones that disagree: a course people loved and never used, and a course that scored modestly and changed how a team works.
What weakens a training survey
Stopping at the smile sheet
A form that asks only whether people enjoyed the day rewards good catering and a likeable trainer. Keep the confidence rating, the obstacles checklist and one knowledge check on it, and run the follow-up, or the survey will keep approving courses that change nothing.
Handing the form to the person being rated
People soften what they write when the trainer collects the paper or stands by the screen. Use a link, a box by the door or a colleague to gather the forms, and give the last ten minutes of the agenda to it so nobody fills it in with a coat on.
Wording that answers itself
'How much did you enjoy today's excellent session?' has told people what to say. Write 'How would you rate this training?' and let the scale carry both ends. Check the introduction too: 'we hope you loved it' does the same damage as a leading question.
Reading only the average
An average of three for level could be a whole room at three, or half the room at one and half at five. Look at how the answers spread, then split them by role, by experience and by whether people chose to attend, before deciding what the course needs.
Collecting answers and changing nothing
Participants who never hear what happened to their comments answer the next form in ten seconds. Open the following course, or the follow-up email, with two things that changed because of the last round, even if they are small.