Questions to Ask in an Ethical Dilemma
For nurses, social workers, managers, business students and anyone else facing a hard call at work or on placement, these are the questions to ask in an ethical dilemma, whether you put them to yourself or to your team. They follow the order a sound decision takes: naming the issue, getting the facts, the people affected, the duties and rules that apply, the options, and the checks to run before you act. Laws, employer policies and professional codes differ from one place to the next, so on those points the list sends you to whoever can answer for your setting.
Want questions from the whole vault instead? Try the random question generator.
The questions
Each question, and why to ask it
The issue
What exactly is the decision I have to make?
Why ask it
Write it as one sentence that ends in a choice, such as 'Do I report the altered timesheet, or raise it with my colleague first?' If you cannot, you are still describing a situation that bothers you, and the next job is finding out more, not deciding.
Is anyone in danger right now, while I am still thinking this over?
Why ask it
Safety comes ahead of deliberation. If someone could be hurt in the next few hours, tell whoever your workplace or program names for urgent concerns, then return to the slower questions.
Is this a true dilemma, or do I already know what is right and dread doing it?
Why ask it
A dilemma has something good on both sides, such as honesty against loyalty. If one side is only convenience, money or avoiding an awkward conversation, the problem is one of courage, and you can move straight to who needs to be told.
Which values are in conflict here?
Why ask it
Name the pair in plain words: truth against loyalty, one person against the group, mercy against fairness, now against later. Once both have names, people who disagree can see that each is defending something worth defending, and the talk gets calmer.
Is this my decision to make?
Why ask it
Plenty of hard calls belong to a patient, a client, a manager or a committee, and your part is to inform, advise or escalate. Ask who holds the authority where you work or study. Deciding something that was never yours is an ethical problem of its own.
Who can I talk this through with before I decide?
Why ask it
Look for someone with no stake in the outcome who is allowed to hear it: a supervisor, a preceptor, an ethics or compliance contact, a mentor outside the team. Check what you may share before giving any detail that identifies a person. If you only want to ask people who will agree with you, that preference is worth noticing.
What is my first instinct, and what is it reacting to?
Why ask it
A gut reaction is information, though it may be answering to something beside the act: a person you dislike, an old case it reminds you of, fear of a fight. Say the instinct out loud, write it down, and look at it again once the facts are in to see whether it held.
What do I personally gain or lose from each outcome?
Why ask it
Put the bonus, the grade, the friendship or the quieter shift on paper, where you can see how hard each one pulls. Having a stake does not make your judgment wrong. A stake you have not admitted to yourself will still steer it.
Facts
What do I know for certain, and what am I assuming?
Why ask it
Draw two columns and be strict about which side each item goes on. Things you were told, things you read into a look or a tone, and motives you have assigned to people all sit under assuming until someone checks them.
Where did each fact come from, and did that person see it firsthand?
Why ask it
Secondhand accounts pick up certainty as they travel. For anything the decision rests on, trace it back to someone who read the record, heard the words or did the count.
What am I missing that could change my answer, and can I get it in time?
Why ask it
Name the one missing fact that would flip your view, then ask how long it takes to find. If it is a phone call, make it. If it is weeks and the harm will not wait, decide on what you have and say so in your notes.
Whose account have I not heard?
Why ask it
Most dilemmas reach you through one person's telling. Work out who else was there, and also whether you are the right person to ask them, since in some settings contacting people yourself can get in the way of a formal process. Ask how that works where you are.
How would the person I disagree with tell this story?
Why ask it
Try to give their version so fairly that they would sign it. If you cannot, you do not know enough yet. If you can and still disagree, your position is stronger for the effort.
Has something like this come up here before, and what was done?
Why ask it
A past case shows what your organization treats as normal and whether its response held up. A long-serving colleague or a supervisor is the person to ask. Treat precedent as a forecast of what will happen, not as proof of what should.
What records exist, and do they match what people are saying?
Why ask it
Charts, emails, logs and invoices carry dates and names where memory supplies impressions. Look only at what you already have proper access to. Opening records you are not entitled to see in order to check a suspicion adds a second problem to the first.
How much time do I really have before the choice is made for me?
Why ask it
Some dilemmas run on a hard clock: a discharge, a filing date, a contract signature. The real deadline tells you whether you can consult properly or must act on partial facts. Once it passes, having waited was the decision.
People
Who is affected by this, including people who will never know a decision was made?
Why ask it
Start with the obvious names, then move outward: families, coworkers who pick up the consequences, later clients, the public. The easiest to forget are usually the ones with no seat in the conversation.
Who has the most to lose, and how much say do they have?
Why ask it
When the person carrying the largest risk has the smallest voice, that imbalance is the center of many dilemmas in care, teaching and management. Ask what it would take to give them a say, or at the least an honest explanation.
What does the person at the center of this want, and has anyone asked them directly?
Why ask it
Teams often debate what is best for someone who is sitting down the hall. Their wishes may not settle it, but a decision made without asking is much harder to defend. If they cannot speak for themselves, find out who is allowed to speak for them under the rules where you practice.
Who am I loyal to, and is that shaping what I see?
Why ask it
Loyalty to a friend, a mentor or a team is a real value, and it also makes their version of events easier to believe. Say plainly whose side you were on before you knew the facts. If the answer is 'theirs', ask someone with no tie to them to read the same facts.
Who gains if this stays quiet?
Why ask it
Follow the benefit. Silence that mostly shields whoever holds the most power or has the most to hide counts against staying quiet. Silence that mostly shields someone vulnerable counts the other way.
Did everyone who agreed to this have a real chance to say no?
Why ask it
Agreement given to a supervisor, a teacher or whoever controls a person's care or paycheck is not always freely given. Ask what would have happened to them if they had refused. If the honest answer is 'nothing good', their yes cannot carry the weight being put on it.
What do I owe each of these people?
Why ask it
Go down your list and put a word beside each name: care, honesty, confidentiality, equal treatment, a warning. Laid side by side, they show where two obligations cannot both be met in full, which is the dilemma stated exactly.
Who will still be living with this after I have moved on?
Why ask it
Students finish placements, managers change jobs, consultants leave. The people who stay with the result deserve more weight than how the choice feels to the one making it.
Duties and rules
Does any option break the law, and who can tell me for sure?
Why ask it
Laws differ by country, state and field, and a confident guess is not good enough here. Ask whoever your organization names for this, such as legal counsel, a compliance office or your professional body's advice line. Being legal is where the ethical question starts, not where it ends.
What does my professional code say about this?
Why ask it
Nursing, social work, accounting, engineering and most other licensed fields publish a code, and many include guidance on common conflicts. Read the section itself instead of trusting what you remember from training. A student can ask an instructor which code governs the placement.
What does our own policy say, and who is the named person to ask?
Why ask it
Employers and schools usually have both a policy and a route: a supervisor, an ethics committee, a compliance officer, an ombudsperson. Find the route early, because some policies expect a concern to go through it before anyone acts alone.
Am I required to report this, to whom, and by when?
Why ask it
Some roles carry a duty to report certain harms, and what must be reported, to which body and how fast depends on where you work and what you are licensed as. Do not guess. Ask your supervisor or regulator how it applies to you, today if a deadline might already be running.
What have I promised, and to whom?
Why ask it
Count the unspoken promises too: a client who assumed privacy, a colleague who spoke in confidence, a contract you signed. The list shows which promise each option would break and whether you could go back and ask to be released from it.
What are the limits of confidentiality here, and was the person told them?
Why ask it
Most confidentiality has edges, and where they sit is set by law, by your code and by your employer. Ask how it works in your setting before you share anything. If the person never heard the limits, plan how you will tell them what you have to pass on and why.
When two duties conflict, which one does my field put first?
Why ask it
Some codes rank their principles or say which obligation gives way, and others leave it to judgment. A supervisor, an ethics committee or a clinical or academic lead can say how the conflict is usually resolved where you are. Note who you asked and what they told you.
Do I have a conflict of interest that someone needs to know about?
Why ask it
A relationship, a financial stake or an old dispute with someone involved can be a reason to hand the decision to another person. Disclosing early is nearly always simpler than explaining later why you kept it to yourself.
Is someone with authority asking me to do something I believe is wrong?
Why ask it
An instruction changes who shares the responsibility but seldom removes yours. Ask for it in writing, ask what it is based on, and find out what route and what protection your workplace or school gives people who raise a concern in good faith.
What would a fair process look like, whatever the outcome?
Why ask it
A hard outcome is easier to accept from a process in which you were heard, given the reasons and treated like others in the same position. When the result cannot please everyone, check that nobody could fairly object to how it was reached.
Options
What are all the options, including the ones between yes and no?
Why ask it
Dilemmas arrive as two choices, and the first pair is rarely the full set. Push for at least four: act now, act later, act in part, hand it to someone else. In a team, ask for one option nobody has said yet before you discuss any of them.
Is there a way to honor both sides instead of choosing one?
Why ask it
Telling the truth kindly, reporting a concern while standing by the colleague, respecting a refusal while leaving the door open: a third path often exists. It is worth ten minutes of looking before you accept that someone has to lose.
What happens if I do nothing?
Why ask it
Inaction has consequences of its own, so describe them as concretely as the rest: who is affected next week, what carries on, who finds out later. Sometimes it is the right choice, but only when it is chosen and not drifted into.
What is likely to follow from each option next week, and a year from now?
Why ask it
Short-term and long-term results often point in opposite directions, which is what makes the easy option tempting. Put one line for each time frame beside every option, and mark the guesses as guesses.
Which option does the most good and the least harm across everyone affected?
Why ask it
Count everyone the decision touches, not only those in the room. The trap in adding up outcomes is that a total can look good while one person bears nearly all the cost, so check who that person would be under each option.
Does any option deceive someone, use them, or take away a choice that is theirs?
Why ask it
An option can score well on outcomes and still be ruled out here. If a plan only works while someone is kept in the dark, ask what they would say if they knew.
Would I decide the same way if a different person were involved?
Why ask it
Swap in someone you like less, someone more senior, someone whose background is unlike yours, and hold the facts still. If the answer moves, find the reason and check whether you would be willing to say it out loud. Being treated like anyone else in the same spot is a large part of what people mean by fair.
Which harms could be undone, and which could not?
Why ask it
A delayed project can be restarted and an apology can follow a mistake, but a breached confidence or a physical injury stays done. When you are unsure, lean toward the option that leaves room to change course.
What if everyone in my position made the same choice?
Why ask it
One rounded number or one skipped check looks harmless by itself. Imagine it as the standing practice of every nurse on the unit or every analyst on the floor, and see whether the thing you all depend on, such as trust in the record, would survive.
What am I telling myself to make the easier option sound fine?
Why ask it
Listen for 'everyone does it', 'nobody really gets hurt', 'just this once' and 'that is not my job', and for soft names such as 'tidying the numbers'. None of these is always false, but they turn up so often ahead of a bad call that hearing yourself say one is a reason to slow down.
What would I choose if there were no consequences for me?
Why ask it
The answer shows what you believe is right once fear is taken out. Then put the fear back and look at it squarely: what exactly could happen to you, how likely it is, and who could help you carry it.
Before you act
Would I be comfortable seeing this decision and my reasons made public?
Why ask it
Picture it reported accurately, with your name, where your family and your clients could read it. The test is not whether people would be pleased but whether you could stand by the reasoning. A plan that depends on nobody finding out needs another look.
Could I explain it face to face to the person it affects most?
Why ask it
Rehearse the actual sentences. Wherever you reach for vague words or leave a part out, you have found the piece of the decision you do not yet believe in.
Would I think this was fair if I were on the receiving end?
Why ask it
Swap seats with each person on your list in turn, not only the most sympathetic one. You need not like the outcome from every chair, but you should be able to see why a reasonable person sitting in it would accept the reasons.
What would the person I most respect in my field do?
Why ask it
Choose a real person, a preceptor, a former manager, a professor, and imagine describing your plan to them. Better still, ask one, leaving out names and identifying details unless you are permitted to share them.
How will I feel about myself after each of these choices?
Why ask it
Ask it of every option, including the brave one, since regret can attach to acting as well as to keeping quiet. Set aside how pleasant next week would be and look at who you would have been: candid or evasive, careful or only comfortable.
Who needs to be told, in what order, and by whom?
Why ask it
A sound decision can still do damage in the way it is delivered. The person most affected usually deserves to hear it directly and before the rumor arrives, but not always: when the matter is a report about someone, you may be asked to tell nobody else. Check whether your policy sets the order, for instance a supervisor or a committee first.
What should I write down about how I decided?
Why ask it
Record the facts you had, the people you consulted, the options you weighed and why you chose as you did, with the date. Ask where notes like these are meant to be kept in your setting. If the decision is questioned later, a record made at the time is far easier to stand behind than a reconstruction.
What will I do if I am pressured to reverse it, or it goes badly?
Why ask it
Settle in advance who you will go to and what would change your mind, as distinct from what would only make you uncomfortable. New facts are a reason to reconsider. Someone being annoyed is not.
What made this dilemma possible, and who can fix that for the next person?
Why ask it
Many dilemmas grow out of a gap: a missing policy, an impossible workload, an incentive that rewards the wrong thing. A short debrief with the team once it is over, with no blame attached, turns one hard week into a repair.
How to work through an ethical dilemma with these questions
Practical guidance for the conversation itself
Before you work through the list
Safety first, deliberation second
If someone is in danger now, the list waits. Use whatever urgent route your workplace, placement or school provides, and return to the slower questions once the immediate risk has been handled. Most dilemmas are not emergencies, and those deserve the time the list takes.
Put the dilemma in one sentence
Write the choice as a single line with both values named, for example 'Keep a colleague's confidence, or tell the manager about a risk to customers'. A sentence like that stops a long discussion from sliding into a different question, and it is the first thing anyone you consult will need from you.
Find your ethics route before you need it
Hospitals often have an ethics committee or consultation service, companies a compliance or integrity line, universities an academic integrity office, and licensed professions an advice service run by the regulator or the association. Which of these exist, and what each can keep confidential, varies from place to place. Ask a supervisor or an instructor which one applies to you.
Take the groups in order
The six groups are a sequence. Arguing over options before the facts are agreed is the usual way these conversations go in circles, so hold off on Options until Facts and People are done. When time is short, take the first two questions of each group, which are the ones that group cannot do without.
Running it as a team discussion
Settle the facts before anyone argues a position
Go around once on the Facts group only, with a rule that nobody proposes a solution yet. Disagreements that looked like clashes of values often turn out to be two people working from different information.
Hear from the most junior person early
Once a senior voice has given a view, students, new staff and assistants tend to fall in behind it. Ask them first, or have everyone write a one-line answer before anyone speaks. The person closest to the client or the work often holds the fact nobody else has.
Argue about values, not about character
Say 'you are weighing loyalty more heavily than I am' and not 'you are covering for him'. Naming the value lets someone change position without losing face, and it keeps the group workable when the same people meet over the next case.
Strip identities when you ask for outside advice
A dilemma can usually be described to a mentor or a class without the names, dates or details that would identify anyone. Check what your confidentiality rules allow before sharing even that much.
End with an owner and a date
Close by saying who decides, who tells the people affected, what gets recorded and when the group will look at how it went. A discussion that ends in general agreement with no named owner often produces no action at all.
For students, case studies and interviews
Use the six groups as the outline of a case analysis
For a written case in nursing, business or social work, a paragraph per group gives you a structure: the issue, the facts, the people affected, the duties and rules, the options, then your choice and how it holds up under the checks in Before you act. Read the assignment brief first, since some courses require a named decision model, and map the groups onto its steps.
State what you would need to find out
Cases leave things out on purpose. A line such as 'the answer depends on whether the client was told the limits of confidentiality' usually shows more judgment than a confident answer built on an assumption.
Make the case for the option you rejected
Give the losing option its strongest argument before explaining why you still chose otherwise. It shows that you saw a dilemma and not merely a rule to apply.
Answering 'tell me about an ethical dilemma you faced'
Interviewers who ask this are usually listening for process more than for drama. Pick a real, modest example and say which two values pulled against each other, who you consulted, what you did and what you would do differently. Leave out anything that identifies a patient, a client or a former employer's private business.
Where ethical decisions go wrong
Deciding first and collecting reasons afterward
If every question on the list happens to support what you wanted at the start, go back to the one about how the other side would tell the story and answer it properly.
Treating 'it is allowed' as the end of the question
Law and policy set a floor. Plenty of things that are permitted are still unkind, unfair or corrosive to trust, and the public, face to face and receiving-end checks in the last group exist to catch those.
Waiting until you are certain
Dilemmas rarely resolve into certainty, and waiting for it hands the decision to the clock. Aim for a choice you can explain, made on the facts available and recorded along with what you did not know.
Carrying it alone
Keeping a hard call to yourself feels discreet, but it removes the check that other people provide and leaves you holding the whole weight. Find the person you are allowed to talk to, even if there is only one.
Mistaking discomfort for wrongdoing
Some right actions feel awful, such as reporting a friend, and some wrong ones feel comfortable because everyone nearby is at ease with them. Feelings are evidence to weigh alongside the facts and the duties, not the verdict.