Skip to content
Question Vault?
Free to readNo accountNo email wallNo invented statisticsNo partial listsCopy or print any set and take it with you

Questions to Ask in Wavelength

Homemade spectrum prompts for Wavelength, for when the deck runs dry. Each is written the way the psychic reads it out, with notes on what the disagreement usually exposes and which prompts to keep for late in the night.

33 questions

Want questions from the whole vault instead? Try the random question generator.

The questions

Each question, and why to ask it

Where does pineapple on pizza fall between crime and delicacy?

Why ask it

A safe first spectrum because everybody already has an opinion and no feelings are at risk. It also shows the table how far apart two reasonable people land on the same word.

Where does cereal fall between soup and not soup?

Why ask it

Definition arguments are the best kind for this game because no fact can settle them. Expect the table to split immediately and stay split.

Where does a hot dog fall between sandwich and its own thing?

Why ask it

The classic category question with no answer underneath it. Watch for the player who tries to end it with a dictionary or a legal definition, which never works.

Where does a two-hour movie fall between short and long?

Why ask it

Numbers feel objective and turn out not to be, which is the confusion this game runs on. Somebody with small children and somebody with a free Sunday will not put two hours in the same place.

Where does karaoke fall between fun and nightmare?

Why ask it

Sorts the room by how people feel about being watched, which is useful information for whatever you play next. Extreme answers here are usually sincere.

Where does texting back three days later fall between fine and unforgivable?

Why ask it

The dial position people choose usually matches their own reply habits, so the argument turns personal faster than they expect. Best with a group who know each other well.

Where does telling someone their cooking is bad fall between honest and rude?

Why ask it

Politeness spectrums expose different upbringings at the same table, and the disagreement is more interesting than the guess.

Where does keeping receipts for six years fall between sensible and unhinged?

Why ask it

Household habits make good spectrums because both extremes are real people, and one of them is sitting at your table.

Where does saying you are five minutes away when you are not fall between harmless and a real lie?

Why ask it

Everybody has told this one, which is why the honest answers come out. Watch for whoever argues it does not count as a lie at all.

Where does going to bed at nine fall between reasonable and giving up?

Why ask it

Reliable disagreement across ages, jobs and childcare situations, and nobody gets hurt by it.

Where does answering a work message at ten at night fall between dedicated and a bad sign?

Why ask it

A spectrum with genuine stakes for coworkers, which is why it plays better on a couch than in the office. The clue giver's own hours leak into the clue.

Where does haggling over a price fall between smart and embarrassing?

Why ask it

Splits along family habit and culture rather than personality, which surprises the table and produces the best stories of the night.

Where does giving cash as a gift fall between thoughtful and lazy?

Why ask it

The dial moves depending on who is receiving it, so the argument becomes about that instead. Let it drift, since that is where the good talk is.

Where does eating the same lunch every day fall between efficient and sad?

Why ask it

Somebody at the table does this, and their defense is the whole point of asking. Keep it light if it is obvious who.

Where does correcting somebody's grammar fall between helpful and insufferable?

Why ask it

Self-implicating, which makes it fun. Whoever lands hardest on helpful is usually the person who does it.

Where does still using a paper map fall between charming and stubborn?

Why ask it

Nostalgia spectrums work well later in the evening because they open stories rather than arguments.

Where does we should do this again soon fall between a plan and a pleasantry?

Why ask it

The answers show how literally people take ordinary social language, which sits behind a lot of low-level friction between friends.

Where does knowing a friend's exact salary fall between normal and too far?

Why ask it

Money privacy varies enormously between families and countries, so this exposes a real divide without anybody having to name a number.

Where does telling a friend their partner is bad news fall between loyal and out of line?

Why ask it

The heaviest prompt here, so keep it for a group that can hold it. The dial usually moves once somebody tells the story behind their answer.

Where does forgiving a ten-year-old grudge fall between healthy and letting them off?

Why ask it

Late-night territory, where the guesses matter less than what people say while defending them. Have a lighter prompt ready for afterwards.

Where do socks with sandals sit between practical and indefensible?

Why ask it

Ages the group instantly, since tolerance for this tends to track how long someone has stopped caring what strangers think. If someone claims total indifference to appearance, this is where you find out whether that holds.

Where does coffee sit between an ordinary drink and a drug?

Why ask it

Heavy drinkers usually place it further toward drug than people who rarely touch it, which is the opposite of what the group expects. Good second round question because it sounds silly and then produces a real conversation about dependence.

Where does the sound of someone chewing sit between neutral and unbearable?

Why ask it

One of the widest spreads you will get, because for some people this is genuinely distressing and for others it does not register at all. Do not let the low scorers tease the high scorers, since that reaction is not a preference.

Where does reading the last page of a book first sit between a personal choice and actually wrong?

Why ask it

Splits a room along whether people think a story belongs to the author or to the reader. The strongest reactions come from people who reread constantly, and their reasoning is usually worth hearing out.

Where does an eight in the morning meeting sit between reasonable and hostile?

Why ask it

Depends almost entirely on commute, caring duties and chronotype, so the disagreement is about circumstances rather than character. Useful with colleagues because it surfaces a scheduling complaint as a joke instead of a grievance.

Where does being ten minutes late sit between nothing at all and disrespectful?

Why ask it

Reliably exposes an unspoken rule that the group has been operating under without agreement. If one person is much stricter than everyone else, they have probably been irritated for months without saying so.

Where does splitting a bill down to the cent sit between fair and petty?

Why ask it

Money questions produce the sharpest edges in an otherwise light game, so place this after a few easy rounds. The answer usually says less about arithmetic than about who in the group has been quietly overpaying.

Where does keeping the heating off to save money sit between thrifty and cruel?

Why ask it

How people grew up shows up here immediately, and often more plainly than in any direct question about money. Keep the tone light if someone's answer suddenly gets specific about a cold childhood house.

Where does bringing an uninvited plus one sit between no big deal and friendship ending?

Why ask it

Hosts and guests answer this from different planets, so ask people to say which role they are imagining. If a wedding is coming up in the group, expect this round to run long.

Where does your favorite band sit between underrated and overrated?

Why ask it

Turns the scale on the person answering rather than on an object, which raises the stakes slightly. The interesting answers come from people who love something they know is overpraised and will still defend it.

Where does your hometown sit between somewhere to leave and somewhere to end up?

Why ask it

The first genuinely personal question here, and it works because a number is easier to say out loud than a paragraph. Follow up with what would move the number rather than why it is where it is.

Where does reading a partner's messages without asking sit between understandable and a hard line?

Why ask it

Best kept for people who know each other, since the answers can land as accusations in a new group. Ask about circumstances rather than absolutes, because most people move their number once a specific scenario is described.

Where does ambition sit between a virtue and a warning sign?

Why ask it

Abstract enough to feel safe and specific enough that answers vary widely by age and by what people have watched ambition cost someone. Ask who they were picturing, because everyone has a particular person in mind.

Using custom spectrums at the table

Practical guidance for the conversation itself

What makes a spectrum work

Two opinions, not two facts

A spectrum only works if nothing can be looked up. Cold to hot works. Tallest mountain does not, because the argument ends the moment somebody reaches for a phone.

Both ends have to be reachable

If nobody would ever choose the left end, the dial only moves through half its range and guessing gets easy. Test a prompt by imagining a real person at each extreme.

One idea per spectrum

Prompts that smuggle in two variables, like cheap and tasty, make a clue impossible to give. Split them into two prompts and run both.

Write the pair down before you read it out

Saying the two ends the same way every round keeps the guessing honest. Rephrasing mid-round quietly moves the target.

Running a round with your own prompt

The sequence

  1. 1Read the prompt aloud, exactly as written, then set a target the rest of the table cannot see.
  2. 2Give one clue and nothing else: no examples, no hedging, no answering questions about it.
  3. 3Let the team argue out loud and place the dial without you.
  4. 4Reveal the target, then ask the two people who were furthest apart to explain themselves. This is where the game stops being about points.

Reading the table

  • Nervous clue givers describe their own position rather than the target. That is normal, and worth noticing rather than calling out.
  • A prompt that produces silence is too abstract. Drop it instead of explaining it.
  • A prompt everybody agrees on instantly is a warm-up, not a round.
  • If an argument turns real, move to the next prompt and pick the topic back up after the game rather than during it.
  • Keep the heaviest prompts, the ones about a friend's partner, an old grudge and reading a partner's messages, for a small group late in the evening.
  • Mixed groups who do not know each other well should stay in the first half of the list.

More on this topic